jira-ai-fixer/docs/executive-en.md

14 KiB

JIRA AI Fixer

Executive Proposal

Date: February 2026
Version: 1.1
Classification: Product Documentation


Executive Summary

The Problem

Support teams face growing challenges in resolving Support Cases:

Challenge Impact
Response time Initial analysis consumes hours of senior developer time
Growing backlog Issues accumulate while team focuses on urgent demands
Variable quality Dependency on individual knowledge about the code
Concentrated knowledge Few specialists know all modules

The Solution

An Artificial Intelligence system that:

  1. Monitors new Support Cases in JIRA automatically
  2. Analyzes the problem and identifies affected source code
  3. Proposes specific fixes in COBOL, SQL, and JCL
  4. Documents the analysis directly in JIRA
  5. Creates branches with fixes for human review

Expected Result

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                         BEFORE vs AFTER                                     │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                             │
│   BEFORE                          AFTER                                     │
│   ──────                          ─────                                     │
│   Issue created                   Issue created                             │
│        ↓                               ↓                                    │
│   Dev analyzes (2-4h)             AI analyzes (5min)                        │
│        ↓                               ↓                                    │
│   Search code (1-2h)              Code identified                           │
│        ↓                               ↓                                    │
│   Investigate cause (2-4h)        Cause + suggested fix                     │
│        ↓                               ↓                                    │
│   Develop fix (2-4h)              Dev reviews and approves                  │
│        ↓                               ↓                                    │
│   Review + deploy                 Review + deploy                           │
│                                                                             │
│   TOTAL: 8-14 hours               TOTAL: 2-4 hours                          │
│                                                                             │
│   ✅ 60-70% reduction in resolution time                                   │
│                                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Why Now?

1. Mature Technology

Language models (GPT-4, Claude, Llama) have reached sufficient quality for code analysis and generation, including legacy languages like COBOL.

2. Competitive Advantage

Leading companies are adopting AI to accelerate development. Those who don't adopt will fall behind in productivity.

3. Manageable Volume

With typical support volumes, the risk is low and the environment is ideal to validate the solution before scaling.

4. Accessible Cost

Operational cost is minimal, especially with free/low-cost LLM options available.


How It Works

Simplified Flow

┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐
│   Support    │     │     AI       │     │    Dev       │
│    Case      │────▶│   Analyzes   │────▶│   Reviews    │
│   (JIRA)     │     │   + Suggests │     │   + Approves │
└──────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────────────┘
      5min                5min               30min-2h

                    ┌─────────────────────┐
                    │   JIRA Comment:     │
                    │   - Root cause      │
                    │   - Affected files  │
                    │   - Proposed fix    │
                    │   - Link to PR      │
                    └─────────────────────┘

Real Example

Issue: "Transaction being declined with code 51 even with available balance"

AI Response (in 5 minutes):

📋 AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS

🔍 Identified Cause:
The AUTH.CBL program is comparing the WS-AVAILABLE-BALANCE field 
with format PIC 9(9)V99, but the value returned from HOST uses 
PIC 9(11)V99, causing truncation.

📁 Affected File:
- src/cobol/AUTH.CBL (lines 1234-1256)

💡 Proposed Fix:
Change WS-AVAILABLE-BALANCE declaration to PIC 9(11)V99
and adjust the comparison in SECTION 3000-VALIDATE.

📊 Confidence: 87%

🔗 PR with fix: bitbucket.example.com/projects/PRODUCT/repos/...

Security: AI Does Not Alter Production Code

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     SEPARATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES                          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                             │
│   CLIENT Repository (production)                                            │
│   Product-Client-Fork                                                       │
│   ├── AI has access: READ ONLY                                             │
│   └── Changes: ONLY by developers                                          │
│                                                                             │
│   AI Repository (isolated)                                                  │
│   Product-Client-AI                                                         │
│   ├── AI has access: READ AND WRITE                                        │
│   └── Purpose: Branches with fix suggestions                               │
│                                                                             │
│   Approval Flow:                                                            │
│   1. AI creates branch in isolated repository                              │
│   2. AI opens Pull Request to client repository                            │
│   3. HUMAN developer reviews                                               │
│   4. HUMAN developer approves or rejects                                   │
│   5. Only then code goes to production                                     │
│                                                                             │
│   ✅ 100% of changes go through human review                               │
│                                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Investment

Pricing Models

Model Description Price
SaaS Hosted, managed by vendor $2,000 - $5,000/month
On-Premise License Self-hosted, perpetual $50,000 - $100,000 one-time
Enterprise Custom deployment + support Contact for quote

ROI Calculation

Senior developer hourly cost: ~$40-80
Average time saved per issue: 6-10 hours
Monthly savings (10 issues): $2,400 - $8,000

SaaS payback: Immediate positive ROI
Enterprise license payback: 12-24 months

Intangible Benefits

Benefit Impact
Standardization All issues analyzed with same rigor
Documentation Complete analysis history in JIRA
Knowledge AI learns patterns, doesn't depend on people
Speed Initial response in minutes, not hours
Team morale Devs focus on complex problems, not repetitive ones

Deployment Options

✅ Fastest time-to-value (days, not months)
✅ No infrastructure to manage
✅ Automatic updates
✅ Included support

Option 2: On-Premise (For Compliance Requirements)

✅ 100% data stays in your infrastructure
✅ Air-gapped option (no internet required)
✅ Full control over updates
✅ One-time license cost

Option 3: Hybrid

✅ You host, we manage
✅ Balance of control and convenience
✅ Flexible pricing

Security and Compliance

LLM Provider Options

Provider Data Location Compliance Level
Azure OpenAI Your Azure tenant Enterprise
Local (Ollama) Your servers Air-gapped
OpenAI API OpenAI cloud Standard
OpenRouter Various Development

Compliance Features

  • Data segregation by client/product
  • Complete audit trail
  • Configurable log retention
  • 100% on-premise deployment option
  • Air-gapped deployment available
  • No code sent to public training datasets

Risks and Mitigations

Risk Probability Mitigation
AI suggests incorrect fix Medium Mandatory human review in 100% of cases
Team resistance Low Position as assistant, not replacement
Code security Configurable Choose Azure/local for compliance
LLM cost increases Low Multiple provider options

Conservative Approach

The system is designed for phased adoption:

Phase 1: Analysis and suggestion only
         AI comments in JIRA, doesn't create code

Phase 2: Code generation in isolated repository
         Human decides whether to use or not

Phase 3: Automatic Pull Requests
         Human still approves

Phase 4: Auto-merge (only for high-confidence fixes)
         Only after months of validation

Implementation Timeline

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                        IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP                               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                             │
│  Week 1-2        Week 3-4        Week 5-6        Week 7+                   │
│  ────────        ────────        ────────        ────────                  │
│  Setup +         Code            Business        Go-Live +                 │
│  Integrations    Indexing        Rules           Refinement               │
│                                                                             │
│  ✓ JIRA          ✓ COBOL         ✓ Modules       ✓ Production             │
│  ✓ Bitbucket     ✓ SQL           ✓ Validation    ✓ Adjustments            │
│  ✓ Portal        ✓ JCL           ✓ Testing       ✓ Support                │
│                                                                             │
│                                               │                             │
│                                               ▼                             │
│                                          LIVE                               │
│                                          ~5-7 weeks                         │
│                                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Solution Differentiators

Why JIRA AI Fixer?

Aspect Generic Tools JIRA AI Fixer
JIRA Integration Manual Automatic
Domain knowledge Generic Configurable business rules
COBOL expertise ⚠️ Limited Optimized for mainframe
Support Case flow Doesn't exist Native
Deployment options Cloud only SaaS, on-prem, or air-gapped
Customization Generic Fully configurable

Next Steps

To Get Started

  1. Schedule Demo - See JIRA AI Fixer in action with your data
  2. Pilot Program - 30-day trial with limited scope
  3. Full Deployment - Production rollout with support

Contact


Conclusion

JIRA AI Fixer represents an opportunity to:

Increase productivity of support team by 60%+
Reduce response time from hours to minutes
Standardize quality of analyses
Retain knowledge independent of people
Choose your deployment - SaaS, on-prem, or air-gapped

The timing is ideal: mature technology, flexible deployment options, and proven ROI.


JIRA AI Fixer - Intelligent Support Case Resolution

Ready to transform your support workflow?